Radiant: Why is the speed grade showing that it is using a timing model at 1.0V and not lowest specified supply voltage which is 0.95V?

• Related Articles

• <div>Radiant: How can user perform Timing Analysis using a different speed grade other than the speed grade of the selected device (or the PAR speed grade)?</div>

  To perform Timing Analysis on different speed grades independent of the PAR speed grade, user can change the Timing Analysis speed grade in 3 ways: 1. Change the strategy setting for PAR Timing Analysis speed grades to a different speed grade than ...

• 1587 - Diamond: What are the different factors that affect device speed, temperature and voltage selection during software timing analysis?

  Software uses different temperatures and voltages for timing analysis based on the following factors: Commercial vs. Industrial Part selection.: Commercial part selection enforces the following DEFAULT temperatures for Setup and Hold analysis (based ...

• 1150 - Diamond: What does the M or Minimum Speed grade mean in a Lattice&nbsp;I/O timing report?&nbsp;<br>

  The M or Minimum Speed grade device appears to be faster than the fastest speed grade in the I/O timing report and the term "Minimum Speed grade" can be a bit confusing. For starters, it does NOT mean the slowest silicon device. The term refers to ...

• 941 - Diamond: Timing: Why does the hold analysis use a different speed grade?

  Diamond: Timing: When running a Hold analysis the default speed grade run is the -M. The -M speed grade is the fastest device across a process and is usually the worst case for a hold analysis. Ideally when looking at a hold analysis the IO Timing ...

• Radiant: Why is the result of my timing different on the PAR report compared with the TWR report?

  The result from .PAR and from .TWR is expected to be different. For Radiant 2023.2, multi-corner timing analysis is implemented, the idea is for: A. 2023.2 1) PAR Timing Analysis (.PAR) - The Timing model used is the model with "WORST" case at ...