Lattice Radiant: How do I achieve 100% timing coverage?

• Related Articles

• Lattice Radiant: Why does the constraint coverage did not improve after using set_false_path constraint?

  By Default, set_false_paths does not improve constraint coverage, however For Radiant 2023.1 or later, the user can use the Timing Command Line Option "-false_covers" to add in the false paths to the timing coverage. This can be applied on the ...

• 2389 - Do BLOCK constraints limit the maximum coverage % reported in the timing report that can be achieved (<100%)?

  The timing report generated by the Lattice Diamond Place and Route Tools report a timing coverage %. This number tells the user how complete their timing report is. Some customers require 100% timing coverage to ensure their designs are fully timed. ...

• Lattice Radiant/Timing Analyzer: Is there a document describing how to use Radiant Timing Analyzer?

  URL below is the Lattice Radiant Tutorial document. Navigate to page 38 for simple steps on how to use Radiant Timing Analyzer. https://www.latticesemi.com/view_document?document_id=53231

• <div>Lattice Radiant version 2022.1 and 2023.1: Why does the Radiant Timing Report indicate an unconstrained path for path with applied constraint such as <i>set_input_delay</i>?<br></div>

  Description: When a user defines a set_input_delay on a port, the timing report will indicate that the port/paths related to the port are unconstrained. Solution: This is a known issue. This is scheduled to be fixed on Fix in Radiant 2023.2.

• Lattice Radiant: What are the Timing constraints for PMI_FIFO_DC using EBR IMPLIMENTATION?

  Here are the constraints to be used: set_max_delay -from [get_pins -hierarchical */*wp_sync1_r*.ff_inst/Q] -to [get_pins -hierarchical */*wp_sync2_r*.ff_inst/DF] 2 set_max_delay -from [get_pins -hierarchical */*rp_sync1_r*.ff_inst/Q] -to [get_pins ...